🔗 Share this article

Following a significant regulatory appeal, a national review panel has overturned a prior decision that blocked Australian-based users from accessing recorded content of the violent event involving influencer Charlie Kirk. This challenge was lodged by Elon Musk's company X, arguing against an directive issued at the request of the online safety regulator.

Details of the Original Ban

Following the death of Charlie Kirk at a US campus in last year, the regulator petitioned the classification board to assess and rate the circulating video. It first determined the content was "refused classification", a rating that allowed the commissioner to instruct platforms to geo-block the videos for an Australian audience.

The platform X challenged the decision for two separate videos related to the Kirk incident. Additionally, it contested a similar ruling on a separate video—showing the assault of Iryna Zarutska on a train in Charlotte—which had likewise been deemed "unacceptable for distribution".

The Platform's Case and Final Ruling

In its appeal, X asserted that the Kirk video contained only brief violence with no visible weapon. The company noted the footage was grainy and the camera quickly panned away from the victim to the surrounding crowd.

X maintained the footage was not excessively detailed, exploitative, or objectionable, adding that it served as a neutral objective record of "a significant incident of public importance that prompted widespread discussion". The platform drew a parallel between the video and the well-known recording of President John F. Kennedy's assassination.

Most members of the classification panel concluded that, "despite the terrible nature of the event," the video did not reach a level that was exploitative, gratuitous, or offensive enough to warrant a 'refused classification' rating. The board suggested that a more detailed depiction with alternative commentary might have resulted in a different ruling. As a result, the board changed the classification of the content to R18+.

The Minority Opinion

A minority on the panel held a contrary view, arguing the video was "a shareable video for the probable aim of amusement and/or benefit (such as likes, shares, or views)". They also argued the parallel with the JFK assassination tape was flawed, as the Kennedy video was released years after the event, "after public sentiment regarding it had subsided".

Reactions to the Decision

Posting on its global government affairs account, X welcomed the ruling.

"We challenged this case to uphold free speech and the critical nature of public access about matters of public significance. We remain dedicated to protecting these fundamental values."

A spokesperson for the eSafety commissioner also welcomed the board's decision, but noted that the new R18+ rating now implies platforms "must take steps to prevent R18+ material is not accessible to Australians who are minors".

Broader Context on Violent Content

Separately, the regulator did not issue take-down orders to platforms this week regarding graphic footage from the Sydney beach incident shared across social media. Officials commented that while the images were upsetting, they had not met the high threshold for a "total ban" rating.

As an alternative, the companies have been advised to apply warning labels and interstitials, such as blurring, on this material in accordance with their existing community guidelines.